Feature 1
Identify accounts requiring action
Review which staff accounts appear in known breaches and what information was exposed.
- Find affected accounts
- Inspect breach context
- Prioritise follow-up
Capability
Compromise Monitoring
Check whether staff email accounts appear in known breach data and keep the exposure visible for follow-up.
The outcome
Reduce the time exposed accounts remain unnoticed and give teams another useful human-risk signal.
How it helps
How Compromise Monitoring works
This capability connects with the wider Apollo platform, so information can support action, evidence and reporting without being entered again.
What is included
One capability, connected to the wider platform
Use the capability you need now while keeping its records, work and evidence ready for related capabilities across Apollo.
Included features
- Staff email checks
- Known breach details
- Exposed-data context
- Organisation and staff views
- Action-required status
- Exposure reporting
Connected platform
Keep exploring Apollo
See where this capability is available and the related capabilities and solutions that use the same connected information.
Compromise Remediation
Guide affected staff through practical account-security steps and record their progress and acknowledgement.
Explore capabilityAwareness Training
Assign practical security learning to staff and maintain clear completion records over time.
Explore capabilityAvailable in:Human Risk Management
Questions and answers
Questions about Compromise Monitoring
Practical answers to common questions about managing this responsibility well.
Why does compromise monitoring matter?
Reduce the time exposed accounts remain unnoticed and give teams another useful human-risk signal.
What should compromise monitoring include?
It should cover staff email checks, known breach details, exposed-data context, organisation and staff views and action-required status, with enough context to support action and explain decisions.
Who should be responsible for compromise monitoring?
Ownership should sit with the person who can make decisions and keep the information current. A specialist or governance team may provide the method, but accountability should not be left with an unnamed group.
How do you keep compromise monitoring current?
Set review dates according to risk and reassess after relevant incidents, material change, new evidence or overdue follow-up work. Preserve the history so changes remain explainable.
What evidence should be retained for compromise monitoring?
Keep the source information, owner, review and approval history, supporting documents and resulting actions needed to show what was considered and what happened next.
See Compromise Monitoring in Apollo
Book a focused demonstration and we will show how the capability fits your current responsibilities, existing information and next practical priorities.