Feature 1
Design the response path
Connect tasks and decisions so each possible outcome leads to the right next action.
- Review the trigger
- Assign task nodes
- Follow every outcome route
Capability
Workflows
Route record events through configured tasks, decisions and outcomes with accountable assignees.
The outcome
Turn a submitted record into a repeatable response process without losing context between people or systems.
How it helps
How Workflows works
This capability connects with the wider Apollo platform, so information can support action, evidence and reporting without being entered again.
Feature 2
Publish without disrupting active work
Make a reviewed draft active while existing executions continue on their original version.
- Inspect the draft
- Confirm assignees
- Publish the version
What is included
One capability, connected to the wider platform
Use the capability you need now while keeping its records, work and evidence ready for related capabilities across Apollo.
Included features
- Record-event triggers
- Task nodes
- Assignees and instructions
- Decision and outcome routes
- Requests for more information
- Draft and published versions
Connected platform
Keep exploring Apollo
See where this capability is available and the related capabilities and solutions that use the same connected information.
Forms
Give staff a guided way to submit structured information without needing access to the underlying register.
Explore capabilityIncident Register
Record incidents, response activity, decisions, related work and lessons in one governed record.
Explore capabilityTask Management
Assign, prioritise and track responsibilities across all aspects of your GRC program.
Explore capabilityAvailable in:Organisational GRC
Questions and answers
Questions about Workflows
Practical answers to common questions about managing this responsibility well.
Why does workflows matter?
Turn a submitted record into a repeatable response process without losing context between people or systems.
What should workflows include?
It should cover record-event triggers, task nodes, assignees and instructions, decision and outcome routes and requests for more information, with enough context to support action and explain decisions.
Who should be responsible for workflows?
Ownership should sit with the person who can make decisions and keep the information current. A specialist or governance team may provide the method, but accountability should not be left with an unnamed group.
How do you keep workflows current?
Set review dates according to risk and reassess after relevant incidents, material change, new evidence or overdue follow-up work. Preserve the history so changes remain explainable.
What evidence should be retained for workflows?
Keep the source information, owner, review and approval history, supporting documents and resulting actions needed to show what was considered and what happened next.
See Workflows in Apollo
Book a focused demonstration and we will show how the capability fits your current responsibilities, existing information and next practical priorities.